I am always wondering if people who are into writing were able to rate the output themselves. Just like after making a clay pot. The maker itself can say that it is a good and quality based output. I know you are the one who wrote it but how will you say it is a good one? How will you know that it is good and pleasant to the readers. I know as they say "A good writer is a good reader" but does that mean you have to re-read and re-read your output until your satisfaction? Will that make changes or will that affects the ways how should readers read the context of your output? It is a big big question for me if you writers were really the one rating your own outputs.